Today, technology is an active part of any individual’s life not only in the United States, but also pretty much from coast-to-coast, and worldwide. We can see technology literally everywhere we turn: in every room of our homes, our cars, our offices, and even in the palm of our hands. Technology has impacted not what we can do everyday, but ultimately what we choose to do everyday. Without technology as it is today we would have many things that could still be seen as in the “Dark Ages”. However, when we use technology we expect it to work 100%, right?

A DUI is a very serious crime, especially within the world we live today. Driving while under the influence of not only alcohol, but any drug that could render an individual physically and mentally incapable to properly function a motor vehicle is one thing that not only kills that motor vehicle driver, but also that of all others around them. Punishment for a DUI does not only impact an individual legally, but also socially as well. Therefore, it is important to make sure that if you are falsely accused of a DUI you get all the facts straight.

Breathalyzer tests are known by now to be faulty instruments that are used in the field of DUI investigations. Many individuals every year are charged, and unfortunately convicted of a DUI thanks to these malfunctioning devices. However, many things and factors can easily alter the results of a breathalyzer exam. One incident shows a man that had a digestive issue that caused him to have some varying form of acid reflex that resulted in some alcohol that is within the stomach and digestive tract to resurface. Unfortunately, the breathalyzer test picked up on this and from there the man was falsely accused for driving while under the influence of alcohol.

Luckily, the man’s case went to court where he brought forth medical evidence that proved his innocence thanks to medical professional testimonies, as well as medical charts. However, some individuals are not always as fortunate as this man and today are having to deal with the consequences of being an innocent individual that has had to deal with faulty equipment that has now impacted their lives forever.

When you have been charged with a criminal offense, you want an experienced defense lawyer protecting your rights every step of the way. I am attorney Michael V. Worgul, and from my offices in Pittsburgh, I have dedicated my entire career to criminal defense. Having handled over 1,000 cases, I know what to expect in court and I am not afraid of a challenge. To start your case call 1-855-DUI-CRIM today!

Today, the United States is within an economic recession. It has people not only counting their cents and dollars carefully, but also spending them wisely. Individuals in the past have gone out and simply just bought things to buy them. However, today, people are beginning to understand the true value of the dollar. As a result of the recession employment opportunities have fallen. One would assume that everyone who has a job is taking full advantage of their position and doing what is asked of them in every way, shape, or form. Yet, that is not the case for some Pennsylvania police officers.

It is no shock that corruption exists within law enforcement entities today. Recently, a report stated that some police officers could not only not administer the standard field sobriety test that is used with individuals who are suspected for drinking and driving, but also not even pass the tests that they performed themselves. If our law enforcement officers are out in the field charging people aimlessly for crimes of such negative demeanor how is it that citizens know that the true criminals are not the one suffering the consequences of a DUI charge, but the innocent citizens who are falsely accused?

In the past, it has been known that DUI evidence can easily be falsified within lab settings, and even out on roadways. From inaccurate breathalyzer results to faulty blood work individuals can easily pinned with a false DUI charge. However, many people can easily be tacked down with more false allegations during a field sobriety test, especially if the officer performing the exam does not know how to properly administer the test.

Individuals today can easily be charged with a false DUI either on purpose, or as a result of incompetence on the side of the law enforcement which our hard earned tax dollars fund on a day-to-day basis.

Whether you are falsely accused or not, drinking alcohol or consuming other drugs and driving simply do not mix well and a designated driver or plan of action is always advised when individuals consume alcoholic beverages.

When you have been charged with a criminal offense, you want an experienced defense lawyer protecting your rights every step of the way. I am attorney Michael V. Worgul, and from my offices in Pittsburgh, I have dedicated my entire career to criminal defense. Having handled over 1,000 cases, I know what to expect in court and I am not afraid of a challenge. To start your case call 1-855-DUI-CRIM today!

For many years now, officers have tried to invade fraternity houses in the hopes of racking up on underage drinking charges; because it is a well known fact that college fraternity parties are filled with minors drinking large amounts of alcohol. Although this makes a reasonable effort in preventing minors from drinking alcohol, this random invasion of fraternity houses costs minors more than just a night of partying. First of all, law enforcement officers who make their way into the fraternity houses have a portable breath test (PBT). Theoretically, the portable breath tests seem like a good idea, but in reality, all they do is produce inaccurate readings–even more inaccurate than the breathalyzer test administered by officers on drivers pulled over for driving while under the influence of alcohol.

When the portable breathalyzers are used, they are taken at face value, which is very unfortunate for the minor involved. If the portable breath test produces a positive reading, even though that reading may be false, it is seen as accurate in the eyes of the court. This is absolutely unacceptable. The ramifications that these portable breathalyzers inflict upon minors is profound, and since the portable breathalyzer test might not be producing an accurate reading, there should be good reason to administer the minor another test before bringing them in based on their portable breathalyzer test results.

Law enforcement officers need to consider the results of a PBT before trying to convict a minor of being over the limit because the results of that test will stay with that minor forever on their permanent record. The minors whose results are proven positive on the portable breathalyzer test will have a difficult time when trying to find future employment, insurance coverage, and many other things.

The results of the portable breathalyzer will impact the minor’s life greatly, so law enforcement officers need to take that into account before they turn the results of the portable breathalyzer test to a court judge. It is not impossible to get out of the charges, but it is difficult. If charged with being over the legal limit of alcohol, it is wise to seek out a wise and experienced attorney to handle your case and who truly has your best interest at heart, and will take care of all your legal needs. Also, be honest with your attorney, because the more that they know, the more they will be able to help you, and win your case.

When you have been charged with a criminal offense, you want an experienced defense lawyer protecting your rights every step of the way. I am attorney Michael V. Worgul, and from my offices in Pittsburgh, I have dedicated my entire career to criminal defense. Having handled over 1,000 cases, I know what to expect in court and I am not afraid of a challenge. To start your case call 1-855-DUI-CRIM today!

A breathalyzer is an instrument used to measure the blood alcohol content (BAC) of the driver of a vehicle who is assumed or suspected to be under the influence of alcohol or any other substance. Many have wondered over the years whether to actually take the breathalyzer test or not. In the law, it states that anyone that is asked or requested to take the test by a law official must submit to the test. Even so, all licensed drivers really needs to do to know the official answer is to simply pull out their license and look at the bottom edge. There you will notice in small, barely legible or noticeable print “Operation of a motor vehicle constitutes consent to any sobriety test required by law.” Many people have barely even noticed, or even have known to look.

By driving merely on a roadway in Pittsburgh, you have given your consent to a breathalyzer, and or a urinalysis or blood test if a law enforcement entity finds it necessary. However, if a law enforcement officer has deemed you impaired by your current state at the time of the investigation, you are only subjected to such testing.

An example would include if a driver, who’s windows had a slightly darker or bad tint beyond the legal limit, was pulled over and the officer at the time, depending on impairment signs noticed and accounted for, deems the driver with impairment and unable to drive properly, which results in all as evidence. A urine test from there is likely request if the driver participates in the sobriety field test and breathalyzer and blows a BAC of 0.00. The state must show the driver exhibited signs of impairment even if the urinalysis shows illegal or prescribed drugs that could be an intoxicant within the driver’s body at the time of the DUI investigation. Recently, video recording of most DUI investigations is now done to show thorough evidence in the court of law and the actual field sobriety test in action. As a juror, a jury member may review and conclude from the videos whether or not the driver seems to be impaired and operating vehicle under normal or unusual pretenses.

If you refuse to submit to a breath, urine, or blood test there are penalties that apply to the drivers resilience, which results in the suspension of your driver’s license for an extended period of time. If a driver refuses to participate more than one time, an individual is liable to be charged with criminal refusal to participate in a sobriety test. From there, the case can carry to a court of law and be used to help accredit a guilty charge, which therefore comes down to the video recording, if available, and record of driver’s cooperation to some degree.

When you have been charged with a criminal offense, you want an experienced defense lawyer protecting your rights every step of the way. I am Pittsuburgh DUI attorney Michael V. Worgul, and from my offices in Pittsburgh, I have dedicated my entire career to criminal defense. Having handled over 1,000 cases, I know what to expect in court and I am not afraid of a challenge. To start your case call 1-855-DUI-CRIM today!